AORN ERAS Center of Excellence in Surgical Safety

What is Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)?

You’re dedicated to excellence in surgical care. We’re here to support that mission. By partnering with the AORN Center of Excellence in Surgical Safety and focusing on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), we provide the tools and protocols to elevate patient outcomes. Let’s redefine surgical recovery together.

Why ERAS Matters

ERAS is a comprehensive, evidence-based approach designed to provide patient-centered, interdisciplinary pathways that help surgical patients achieve early recovery.1 By implementing standardized care protocols, ERAS ensures that all patients receive the highest standard of care, regardless of their background or circumstances.

ERAS Co-sponser Logos CONEMD Solventum AORN

ERAS Promotes Health Equity

Get patients back to their normal lives quicker:

ERAS protocols have been proven to shorten recovery times and reduce complications, leading to improved financial outcomes.2

Consistency in Care:

ERAS provides health equity across a facility so that every patient’s experience is enhanced. By providing consistent, high-quality care to all patients, ERAS helps reduce disparities in surgical outcomes across different populations.

Multidisciplinary Approach:

ERAS involves collaborative effort and constant communication among surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals to ensure the best possible care for patients.

How Can We Enable Patients to Have the Best Possible Surgical Experience?

It starts with patient education and data tracking.

ERAS empowers patients by providing them with the right resources and knowledge about their surgery and recovery. Tracking of patient data from before and during the surgery helps the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) team optimize each individual's recovery.

Achieve your goal of delivering the best patient care, ensuring health equity and excellence for every patient.

Better Outcomes = Lower Costs

In a 640-patient study at John Hopkins Hospital, researchers saw 17.3% reduction in variable direct cost, a total of $1,897 savings per patient.3 This extends from:

26.4% or 1.9 days reduction in mean length of stay per patient3

Reduction in 30-day morbidities: surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, and urinary tract infections3

Reduction in major routine cost categories like supplies, operating room, medications, and radiology3

So how does this translate to your organization’s bottom line?

A financial model and sensitivity analysis showed that Implementation of an ERAS program that supports 500 annual cases could mean:

$395,717

of Net Savings in the first year (implementation, personnel, and materials)4

$591,556

of Net Savings in Maintenance (personnel and materials)4

Join Us in Promoting Implementation of ERAS

As a sponsor of the AORN Center of Excellence in Surgical Safety, we are committed to advancing health equity through the implementation of ERAS protocols. We invite you to learn more about this transformative program and how it can benefit your patients and healthcare facility.

Get Involved

Sign up for our free gap analysis and be the first to know about exciting updates and opportunities to participate in the ERAS program. Together, we can make a difference in patient care and promote a healthier, more equitable future.

Enhanced recovery after surgery. ERAS Society. Accessed March 17, 2025. https://erassociety.org/
AORN Guideline for Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). Published 2025.
Wick EC, Galante DJ, Hobson DB, et al. Organizational culture changes result in improvement in patient centered outcomes: implementation of an integrated recovery pathway for surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(3):669-677. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.05.008
Stone AB, Grant MC, Pio Roda C, et al. Implementation costs of an enhanced recovery after surgery program in the United States: a financial model and sensitivity analysis based on experiences at a quaternary academic medical center. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(3):219-225. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.11.021