Uterine Manipulators
- Improves exposure and defines the colpotomy plane
- S-curve design enables easier insertion and better access
- Cervical cup enhances precise, energy-compatible colpotomy
Supporting Gynecology Surgery Outcomes from Start to Finish
AirSeal® allows surgeons to perform surgery at a set pressure, ensuring a consistent working space. By maintaining stable pneumoperitoneum and continuous smoke evacuation, gynecologists experience uninterrupted visibility during low pressure operations, even with an open vaginal cuff during colpotomy.
The faster we can get people out of recovery, even if it’s just minutes, helps our surgeons be able to proceed with our next procedure and provide quality care to more patients.
Bahareh M. Nejad, MD
Director of Robotic Surgery and Clinical Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Uterine Manipulators
Energy
Look at CONMED's full suite of innovate gynecologic solutions to support your case from entry to closure.
1 Ramshaw B, Forman B, Heidel E, Dean J, Gamenthaler A, Fabian M. A Clinical Quality Improvement (CQI) Project to Improve Pain After Laparoscopic
Ventral Hernia Repair. Surg Technol Int. 2016;29:125-130.
2 Foley CE, Ryan E, Huang JQ. Less is more: clinical impact of decreasing pneumoperitoneum pressures during robotic surgery. J Robot Surg.
2021;15(2):299-307. doi:10.1007/s11701-020-01104-4
3 Ferroni MC, Abaza R. Feasibility of robot-assisted prostatectomy performed at ultra-low pneumoperitoneum pressure of 6 mmHg and comparison of clinical
outcomes vs standard pressure of 15 mmHg. BJU Int. 2019;124(2):308-313. doi:10.1111/bju.14682
4 Saway JP, McCaul M, Mulekar MS, McMahon DP, Richards WO. Review of Outcomes of Low Verses Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic
Surgery. Am Surg. 2022;88(8):1832-1837. doi:10.1177/00031348221084956
5 Ramshaw B, Vetrano V, Jagadish M, Forman B, Heidel E, Mancini M. Laparoscopic approach for the treatment of chronic groin pain after inguinal hernia
repair : Laparoscopic approach for inguinodynia. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(12):5267-5274. doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5600-3
6 Abaza R, Martinez O, Ferroni MC, Bsatee A, Gerhard RS. Same Day Discharge after Robotic Radical Prostatectomy. J Urol. 2019;202(5):959-963.
doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000000353
7 Buda A, Di Martino G, Borghese M, et al. Low-Pressure Laparoscopy Using the AirSeal System versus Standard Insufflation in Early-Stage Endometrial
Cancer: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study (ARIEL Study). Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(3):531. Published 2022 Mar 14. doi:10.3390/healthcare10030531
8 Celarier S, Monziols S, Célérier B, et al. Low-pressure versus standard pressure laparoscopic colorectal surgery (PAROS trial): a phase III randomized
controlled trial. Br J Surg. 2021;108(8):998-1005. doi:10.1093/bjs/znab069
9 Desroches B, Porter J, Bhayani S, Figenshau R, Liu PY, Stifelman M. Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Valveless and Standard Insufflation During
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-institutional Trial. Urology. 2021;153:185-191. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.047
doi:10.1007/s11701-020-01117-z